Efficacy and safety of a protease inhibitor with pegylated interferon and ribavirin in patients with untreated chronic hepatitis C: a meta analysis / 中华肝脏病杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compare the efficacy and safety of a double therapy containing pegylated interferon and ribavirin to a triple therapy (with addition of a protease inhibitor) for untreated chronic hepatitis C with genotype 1 infection.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>We searched Pub med, EMBASE, OVID, the Cochrane Library Clinical Trials Registry and included relevant randomized controlled trials for comparing the efficacy and safety of the triple therapy to the double therapy in HCV genotype 1 untreated patient, using terms: protease inhibitor, hepatitis C, genotype 1. The primary endpoints were composed of the rates of SVR, the rates of relapse, the rates of anemia, and the rates of discontinuation due to severe adverse events, respectively.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Five trials (involving a total of 3200 patients) were included. Data showed the triple therapy with either telaprevir or boceprevir significantly increased the SVR rate and decreased the relapse rate compared with the double therapy [for SVR rate, 65.4% vs. 40.9%, OR=2.92, 95% CI 2.5 to 3.42, P less than 0.01, and for relapse rate, 11.3% vs. 24.8%, OR=0.42, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.68, P less than 0.01], but the triple therapy associated with higher side effects and intolerability [ higher anemia rate, 44.1 % vs. 26.2%, OR=2.25, 95% CI 1.9 to 2.65, P less than 0.01 and higher discontinuation rate owing to severe adverse events, 12.4% vs. 7.7%, OR=1.66, 95% CI 1.19 to 2.32, P less than 0.01]. Subgroup analysis found that the rates of SVR were still higher and the relapse rates were lower in all triple treatment groups [composed by 24 (or 28) -week groups, 48-week groups, and response-guided therapy groups] than that of the double therapy.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>A triple therapy with peginterferon-ribavirin plus either boceprevir or telaprevir significantly increased the rate of sustained virologic response among untreated patients infected with hepatitis C genotype 1. Both the incidence of adverse events and the frequency of discontinuation owing to severe adverse events were higher in patients receiving the triple therapy than those receiving the standard double therapy.</p>

Comparison of peg-interferon monotherapy to peg-interferon and nucleoside analogue combination therapy for hepatitis B: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials / 中华肝脏病杂志

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pegylated-interferon (Peg-IFN) treatment as monotherapy or in combination with nucleoside analogues (NAs) for treating chronic hepatis B (CHB) infection.Searches of PubMed, OVID, EMBASE, and the Chinese Medical (WanFang, CNKI, and VIP) databases were conducted to identify all relevant randomized controlled trials published since January 1990. Twelve studies comparing Peg-IFN monotherapy to NA combination therapy (lamivudine (LAM), n =8); adefovir (ADV), n = 4) met the inclusion criteria (treatment duration, range: 48-52 weeks; follow-up, range: 24 weeks to three years). Meta-analysis was performed with RevMan 5.0 using the fixed-effects and random-effects models. Patients who had received combination therapy had a higher biochemical response rate at the end of treatment than those who had received monotherapy (51.1% vs. 38.9%, odds ratio (OR) = 1.63, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.33-2.01, P less than 0.01). Subgroup analysis of Peg-IFN combination therapies with LAM or ADV indicated that neither NA type significantly enhanced the increased efficacy of combination therapy compared to monotherapy. The combination therapy subgroups also had higher virologic response rates at the end of treatment than the monotherapy subgroups (LAM: 65.9% vs. 34.9%, OR = 3.57, 95% CI: 1.83-6.95, P less than 0.01; ADV: 74.6% vs. 46.2%, OR = 3.66, 95% CI: 2.13-6.30, P less than 0.01). Moreover, the combination therapy group had a higher sustained biochemical response rate at the end of follow-up than the monotherapy group (47.6% vs. 42.1%, OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.05-1.55, P less than 0.05). The LAM combination therapy subgroup had a significantly higher biochemical response rate than the monotherapy subgroup, but there was no significant difference between the LAM and ADV combination therapy subgroups. At the end of follow-up, the ADV combination therapy subgroup had a significantly lower rate of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) than the monotherapy subgroup, but there was no significant difference between the ADV and LAM combination therapy subgroups for HbeAg reduction. The combination therapy group and monotherapy group showed no statistically significant differences in HBsAg reduction or occurrence of severe adverse events. Peg-IFN/NA combination therapy produces a higher biochemical response rate in CHB patients than PEG-IFN monotherapy. Moreover, Peg-IFN/ADV combination therapy produces a greater reduction in HBeAg than Peg-IFN monotherapy.